Sambhal CO Anuj Chaudhary stirs controversy once more: 'If you want to serve seviyan, you’ll have to eat gujiya'

Sambhal CDO Anuj Chaudhary Finds Himself in Another Storm Over Festive Food Remark

In Uttar Pradesh's Sambhal district, Chief Development Officer Anuj Chaudhary has stirred fresh controversy with what many are calling an insensitive analogy about religious festivals. During a public event discussing community harmony, the bureaucrat reportedly stated, "If you want to serve seviyan, you'll have to eat gujiya," drawing immediate criticism from community leaders and residents alike.  

The remark, equating the Muslim Eid delicacy seviyan with the Hindu Holi sweet gujiya, struck many as an inappropriate comparison that risked trivializing interfaith relations. Local social worker Mohammad Aslam voiced the growing frustration, saying, "Our festivals are about sharing happiness, not keeping score. When officials make such careless statements, it only creates unnecessary tension."

This isn't the first time Chaudhary has courted controversy. The officer has previously faced allegations of favoritism in welfare scheme allocations, with critics accusing him of failing to maintain the impartiality expected of civil servants. While some supporters argue his latest comment was merely advocating cultural exchange, the damage appears done, with opposition leaders demanding an official apology.  

District administration officials remained tight-lipped when pressed for comment, though sources indicate the matter may be reviewed internally. As the debate continues, the incident highlights the delicate balance public figures must maintain in India's diverse social fabric - where a single ill-considered remark can overshadow months of administrative work.  

The episode serves as a reminder of how deeply food and festivals are intertwined with identity in India, and how easily they can become flashpoints when discussed without sensitivity. For now, residents await whether Chaudhary will clarify his statement or face consequences for yet another controversial utterance.